Sunday, February 26, 2017

Sincerity In NOT Enough!



 “If you ‘sincerely’ drink poison… it will kill you.

If you sincerely believe a lie, you will suffer the consequences.

You must not only be sincere…   you must be right.”                        
 - Charles Spurgeon



            When I was twenty-seven, my father died. I spent a great deal of time with two fervently religious women, each of whom I dearly loved, after his death, as I worked through my grief. 


One was my godmother: a practicing Catholic, she spent a week every summer in a convent in north Idaho and was as devout as any person I know. With my own mother’s death three decades past in my timeline, my godmother has been the closest parent I’ve had for the majority of my life. Her daughters are my sisters in every meaningful (non-biological) sense of the world, and I’m proud to be part of their family. She was (and is) kind, loving, gentle, God-fearing, and as “deserving” of grace as any person I’ve ever known.


The other was the woman I’d been dating just prior to his death: a devoted Latter-Day Saint, she and I had just spent many, many days in conversation and prayer trying to make our different religious beliefs coincide enough to commit our lives to each other with clear consciences. Alas, as much as we truly loved each other, we saw that those differences were too great, so we stopped dating. Then my father died two weeks later, and she came back to me and said, “For as long as you need me to get through this, I am yours” – one of the most loving gestures anyone has ever done for me. She and I really never saw much of each other again: she started dating a gentleman of her own faith soon after, and was married two years later, while I moved to Idaho the following summer and lost touch with her family. Like my godmother, she was an amazingly kind, loving, gentle, God-fearing, “deserving” of grace person beyond almost everyone I’ve ever known.


And according to each of their particular faiths, the other one is going to Hell when she dies.

And according to mine, they both are.


How do we justify this in our minds?  Do we rail against God for “condemning good people to Hell”? Do we argue semantics with the Bible, looking for the loophole to show that works are more important that faith?

Or do we return to Scripture, hat in hand, as we must always do when we have questions or doubts, and read what God’s Word tells us?

“There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God. All have turned away; they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one.”                      
 - Romans 3:10-12

We are all sinners. We all deserve Hell.

And the only reason – the only reason – that anyone is saved from the fate we have earned as Adam’s progeny, is that God sent His only son to die on a Roman torture device to pay our Hell-bound penance for us, presuminghere’s the catch! – presuming that we followed Him as our Lord and Savior, as spelled out in Scripture. 

“I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.”  
 - Jesus Christ, as quoted in John 14:6

But, my ladyfriend and my godmother would both say they follow Christ as Lord! They both fervently believe in the teachings of their church, and the basic tenet of Christianity that “if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.” (Romans 10:9). 

Isn’t that enough?
Yes… and that’s their difficulty. To accept Jesus as your Lord means that you have to follow His teachings. Where do we find those teachings? In the Bible. Nowhere else.
 
The greatest victory Satan ever won (post-garden of Eden category) was the corruption of the Holy See in the Dark Ages, the unholy papal line whose corruption exceeded any civilian dynasty ever imagined. The Catholic Church was the only game in town for Christians for over a millennium, and its priorities were best spelled out in the doctrine of Papal Infallibility, essentially declaring that the Pope was God. [I applaud the movement of the current form of the Catholic Church, which is earnestly trying to undo the wrongs of fifteen centuries – but it’s slow work, and the damage has been done.] The second most important human being who ever lived, in my humble opinion, wasn’t Moses or Abraham or David or Solomon. It was Martin Luther, who by nailing those 95 treatises on the door of the Wittenburg church on October 31, 1517 (now known as Reformation Day), freed the entire Christian people of the enslavement of the Catholic Church. [That’s an entirely different vignette, however. Let’s not get distracted…]

Similarly, the “third testaments” of religions like the Latter-Day Saints blatantly violate such Scriptures as Galatians 1:8-9 (“But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!”) and Revelation 22:18-19 (“I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book”). Like the vast list of procedures and requirements written by men in the Catholic age for its believers, the poor LDS faithful have been saddled with an entire book’s worth of non-Scriptural beliefs and procedures that serve only to cloud God’s Word and Christ’s requirements. 


I hope and pray that in His infinite Wisdom and Love, the Almighty Father will be able to see through those barriers that humans have built within all of our various Christian sects, and save as many of us poor, wretched souls that have somehow managed to truly follow HIS Word, despite all of the extraneous noise that the Adversary has kept His believers swimming in for almost two thousand years.


And I desperately hope and pray that my ladyfriend and godmother are two of them.


Saturday, February 25, 2017

Pardon me while the mathematician goes berzerk.

This is what you get when you take a math major and turn him into a devotee of the Lord. 

While reading through the "Bible-In-A-Year", as I do starting every January 1st, I came to First Kings and chapters 6-7, which describe the Temple of Solomon in painfully exacting detail. Here's what struck me:

Did you realize that if you took fifteen exact replicas of the Temple of Solomon (1st Kings 6:2), and placed them side by side, they would be the exact same size and dimensions as Noah's Ark (Genesis 6:15)?

Similarly, in 6:23-27, the mathematician in me went bonkers listening to the author spend five sentences describing what he'd essentially covered in one. If it's a 20-cubit room, and each cherub is ten cubits wide...


23In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim of olivewood, each ten cubits high. 24Five cubits was the length of one wing of the cherub, and five cubits the length of the other wing of the cherub; it was ten cubits from the tip of one wing to the tip of the other. 25The other cherub also measured ten cubits; both cherubim had the same measure and the same form. 26The height of one cherub was ten cubits, and so was that of the other cherub. 27He put the cherubim in the innermost part of the house. And the wings of the cherubim were spread out so that a wing of one touched the one wall, and a wing of the other cherub touched the other wall; their other wings touched each other in the middle of the house.



Okay, we get the picture. The cherubs fit perfectly on that wall. Those of us who could add fives had already figured that out!

Friday, February 24, 2017

NFL suggestions from ESPN's Bill Barnwell

  •  Here is the link to the actual article from ESPN, which is completely worth a look if you have an interest in the off-season moves in the NFL. The links in the hub article below may or may not work, which means you might have to access them via the link above. No big deal.
     
    Bill Barnwell - ESPN Staff Writer






Some NFL teams have a lot to do before the new league year begins March 9, while others won't have to make critical calls until the first day of the NFL draft on April 27. Click on the links below to read about the first five things that should be on the minds of each team's brass as they prepare for the offseason.

FROM ACT II: Note that there are actually 8 spoke articles, not 32, as each is divided up into divisions rather than teams. It's far too early for us to start making our predictions for the 2017 season to come - we're still salivating over the footy season that's about to start!
Arizona Cardinals: Should Arizona put the franchise tag on star pass-rusher Chandler Jones or let him hit the open market? Five moves for the Cardinals.
Atlanta Falcons: What are the Falcons' options with RB Devonta Freeman, who's nearing the end of his cheap rookie contract? Five moves for the Falcons.
Baltimore Ravens: Brandon Williams has established himself as one of the NFL's best nose tackles. Baltimore has to decide: Pay him or let him walk. Five moves for the Ravens.
Buffalo Bills: Should the Bills stick with quarterback Tyrod Taylor or start over with someone fresh in the draft or free agency? Five moves for the Bills.
Carolina Panthers: The Panthers have a clear need for a deep threat at wide receiver. Who makes the most sense for Carolina to target in free agency? Five moves for the Panthers.
Chicago Bears: Chicago has the option of putting the franchise tag on WR Alshon Jeffery. But is he worth $17.5 million for 2017? Five moves for the Bears.
Cincinnati Bengals: Tyler Eifert is entering the final season of his rookie contract. Should the Bengals extend him now or wait to see if he can stay healthy? Five moves for the Bengals.
Cleveland Browns: Which makes more sense for Cleveland: draft a quarterback in the first round or target one in free agency? Five moves for the Browns.
Dallas Cowboys: What kind of value should the Cowboys be looking for when fielding trade offers for quarterback Tony Romo? Five moves for the Cowboys.
Denver Broncos: The Broncos have two young quarterbacks on the roster, but should they go all-in for Romo? Five moves for the Broncos.
Detroit Lions: Ezekiel Ansah had only two sacks in 2016. Is now really the time for the Lions to sign the pass-rusher to an extension? Five moves for the Lions.
Green Bay Packers: What should the Packers do about their gaping hole at running back? Do any big names make sense? Five moves for the Packers.
Houston Texans: The Texans need a quarterback and Jimmy Garoppolo could be an option. What would they have to give up to get him? Five moves for the Texans.
Indianapolis Colts: How should the Colts address their massive void at pass-rusher with the free-agent market looking as if it will be thin at the position? Five moves for the Colts.
Jacksonville Jaguars: The Jaguars have the money to give Allen Robinson an extension. What can they expect to pay for the WR? Five moves for the Jaguars.
Kansas City Chiefs: Both Eric Berry and Dontari Poe are set to hit the free-agent market. Is it possible for K.C. to keep both of them? Five moves for the Chiefs.
Los Angeles Chargers: Should the Chargers sign pass-rusher Melvin Ingram to a long-term deal or let him play with the franchise tag? Five moves for the Chargers.
Los Angeles Rams: The Rams let CB Janoris Jenkins walk in free agency last year. Can they really afford to let Trumaine Johnson leave too? Five moves for the Rams.
Miami Dolphins: Free-agent-to-be Kenny Stills had nine TDs in 2016. Is that reason enough for the Dolphins to re-sign him? Five moves for the Dolphins.
Minnesota Vikings: How should the Vikings handle Adrian Peterson's $18 million cap hit, the highest (by far) for a running back? Five moves for the Vikings.
New England Patriots: How much leverage do the Patriots have in Jimmy Garoppolo trade negotiations, and should they move the QB? Five moves for the Patriots.
New Orleans Saints: How can New Orleans fill its void at pass-rusher without breaking the bank in free agency? Five moves for the Saints.
New York Giants: The Giants have two key defensive linemen getting ready to hit free agency. Should they retain both Jason Pierre-Paul and Johnathan Hankins? Five moves for the Giants.
New York Jets: The Jets (again) have a hole at quarterback with no heir apparent on the roster. What are they to do now? Five moves for the Jets.
Oakland Raiders: Quarterback Derek Carr has only one season left on his team-friendly rookie contract. How much should the Raiders expect to pay? Five moves for the Raiders.
Philadelphia Eagles: Does a reunion with former Eagles WR DeSean Jackson (now a free agent) make sense for Philly? Five moves for the Eagles.
Pittsburgh Steelers: Both Le'Veon Bell and Antonio Brown are set to receive big raises. How can the Steelers make both work? Five moves for the Steelers.
San Francisco 49ers: What should the 49ers do with the No. 2 overall pick -- draft a QB, trade it for a QB or take the best player available? Five moves for the 49ers.
Seattle Seahawks: Jimmy Graham has only one year and $10 million left on his contract. Does it make sense to give the TE an extension? Five moves for the Seahawks.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: RB Doug Martin had a disappointing season after getting a hefty contract. Should the Bucs keep him around? Five moves for the Buccaneers.
Tennessee Titans: The Titans are fond of running two-TE sets. Which free agent makes the most sense for them to target? Five moves for the Titans.
Washington: For the second season in a row, Washington has a decision to make on QB Kirk Cousins. Is a long-term deal in the team's future? Five moves for Washington.

Cyrano And The Lord



 “A large nose is in fact the sign of an affable man, good, courteous, witty, liberal, courageous, such as I am.”

“A kiss, when all is said, what is it? A rosy dot placed on the “I” in “loving”. ‘Tis a secret told to the mouth instead of the ear.              
     - Edmond Rostand, “Cyrano”

Ever read the story of Cyrano de Bergerac?
            The French poet Edmond Rostand wrote a (fictional) play in 1897 about Cyrano, in which the large-nosed, slightly grotesque, yet brilliant and eloquent and charming Cyrano falls in love with the beautiful Roxane. However, his fears of rejection (for obvious reasons!) lead him to enlist the help of a proxy, in the person of Christian de Neuvillette. Christian is much better looking, but also much less intelligent than the man he’s representing.
            In the critical scene, Cyrano and Christian are outside Roxane’s window (think Romeo and Juliet!), with Cyrano in the foliage hiding and Christian seemingly alone under her balcony. When Roxane comes to see who her suitor is, Cyrano feeds his proxy the words he needs to woo her – romantic and eloquent verses that succeed in winning her heart.
          Unfortunately…that means that Roxane falls in love with Christian, and not Cyrano. The remainder of the story, of course, is how slowly, slowly, Roxane starts to learn who Cyrano really is as a person, and slowly she grows to fall in a deeper love with him (as opposed to the surface affections she had for Christian).

         Consider the parallels between that story and the story of Our Lord God Almighty and His beloved Son, Jesus Christ.

          Put God the Father in the role of Cyrano, Jesus Christ (the Son) in the role of Christian (how ironic!), and we the people of the believing body of the church in the role of Roxane.
            God the Father may not be “large nosed” or “slightly grotesque” (He certainly qualifies as brilliant and eloquent!), but He has trouble connecting tangibly with us, His beloved, because He only appears to us as columns of fire, or sentient clouds, or a burning bush, or (more often) simply as disembodied actions and communications from On High. You can see how, sometimes, that might be difficult for us to form a loving relationship with! And while the Lord our God has no fear, He certainly had enough rejection from His beloved in the Old Testament to make up for any lack of fear in the equation.
            So, He enlists the help of a proxy – Jesus Christ. Christ is much better looking than His Father, in the sense that He exists in a much more tangible, accessible form for humans to connect with. All accounts tell us that despite the prophesies of Isaiah, Our Lord Jesus Christ was also fairly handsome, as logic would dictate the Perfect Man might very well be. And while Jesus was of course intelligent on so many levels, He did give up His divinity and the access to divine knowledge while in human form, so certainly in comparison to His Father, we can justify the analogy of His being “less intelligent” than God.
            So, Jesus comes to earth, is born fully man and fully God, is baptized by John and blessed by His Father, and He starts His three-plus year “wooing” of His Father’s beloved on His behalf – namely, us. The words He courts us with are His Father’s words (“It is written”), the miraculous power He demonstrates to the flock comes from Above, and He even tells us point blank that all the power He displays comes from God Above, not from Him. So…Jesus is essentially wooing us with His Father’s words, deeds, and powers. 

            But we didn’t fall in love with God…we became Christians, not “God-ians”.
           Just like Roxane, we fell in love with the proxy, the One who was slain on the cross outside the city of Jerusalem. God sent His Only Son to earth for many reasons, one of the most important (to us, certainly!) was as a proxy for our sins. The violent and bloody death of the Perfect, Sinless Man served as the eternal replacement for all the blood sacrifices we were required to make to atone for our many sins. But He also came to replace the old covenants with a New Covenant, a Covenant which came from God but was delivered by Jesus Christ. In the process of our interactions from the balcony with Christ, we chose to worship HIM more than we worship GOD.

       So the question becomes: Is that bad? Should we see Jesus as only the messenger for God, the “Christian” to His “Cyrano”?
          Of course not. That’s where the analogy breaks down.

          But it’s important to understand the relationship between the two: Jesus Christ is wholly God, an integral and honored part of the Trinity – but He is not more important than God the Father, any more than He is more (or less) important than God the Holy Spirit, any more than the Father is more important than the Son. They are all God, and while they often function in different spheres, they are inseparable. “Ranking” the Trinity is a fool’s game; at best, it’s like asking a parent who their favorite child is (although in this case it’s closer to asking a child the reverse question).
          We worship God. We worship Christ. We worship the Holy Spirit.
          We call ourselves “Christians” because the Hebrew nation could have rightly been called “God-ians”. (For some reason, we never think of ourselves as “Holy Spirit-ians”, although for me, that’s the aspect of the Trinity I most often associate with!). But we respect, love, and worship the entire Triune God as our Lord and Master, and that’s why the analogy breaks down.
           (But, just like Cyrano, our story still has a really happy ending!)